[White Around the Collar]
The Meandering Mind of a Prairie Priest
 


Tuesday, November 29, 2005

The Long Awaited Document Arrives

Here is the official English translation:

INTRODUCTION

“In continuity with the teaching of Vatican Council II and, in particular, with the Decree ‘Optatam Totius’ on priestly formation, the Congregation for Catholic Education has published various documents with the aim or promoting a suitable, integral formation of future priests, by offering guidelines and precise norms regarding its diverse aspects. In the meantime, the 1990 Synod of Bishops also reflected on the formation of priests in the circumstances of the present day. … Following this Synod, John Paul II published the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation ‘Pastores Dabo Vobis’.”

“The present Instruction does not intend to dwell on all questions in the area of affectivity and sexuality that require an attentive discernment during the entire period of formation. Rather, it contains norms concerning a specific question, made more urgent by the current situation, and that is: whether to admit to the seminary and to holy orders candidates who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies."

AFFECTIVE MATURITY AND SPIRITUAL FATHERHOOD

“According to the constant Tradition of the Church, only a baptized person of the male sex validly receives sacred ordination. By means of the Sacrament of Orders, … the priest, in fact, sacramentally represents Christ, the head, shepherd and spouse of the Church. Because of this configuration to Christ, the entire life of the sacred minister must be animated by the gift of his whole person to the Church and by an authentic pastoral charity.

“The candidate to the ordained ministry, therefore, must reach affective maturity. Such maturity will allow him to relate correctly to both men and women, developing in him a true sense of spiritual fatherhood towards the Church community that will be entrusted to him.”

HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE ORDAINED MINISTRY

“The Catechism of the Catholic Church distinguishes between homosexual acts and homosexual tendencies. Regarding acts, it teaches that Sacred Scripture presents them as grave sins. The Tradition has constantly considered them as intrinsically immoral and contrary to the natural law. Consequently, under no circumstances can they be approved.

“Deep-seated homosexual tendencies, which are found in a number of men and women, are also objectively disordered and, for those same people, often constitute a trial. Such persons must be accepted with respect and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.”

“In the light of such teaching, this dicastery, in accord with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, believes it necessary to state clearly that the Church, while profoundly respecting the persons in question, cannot admit to the seminary or to holy orders those who practice homosexuality, present deep-seated homosexual tendencies, or support the so-called ‘gay culture’.”

“One must in no way overlook the negative consequences that can derive from the ordination of persons with deep-seated homosexual tendencies.

“Different, however, would be the case in which one were dealing with homosexual tendencies that were only the expression of a transitory problem - for example, that of an adolescence not yet superseded. Nevertheless, such tendencies must be clearly overcome at least three years before ordination to the diaconate.”

DISCERNMENT OF THE CHURCH CONCERNING THE SUITABILITY OF CANDIDATES

“The desire alone to become a priest is not sufficient, and there does not exist a right to receive sacred ordination. It belongs to the Church - in her responsibility to define the necessary requirements for receiving the Sacraments instituted by Christ - to discern the suitability of him who desires to enter the seminary, to accompany him during his years of formation, and to call him to holy orders if he is judged to possess the necessary qualities.

“The formation of the future priest must distinctly articulate, in an essentially complementary manner, the four dimensions of formation: human, spiritual, intellectual, and pastoral. In this context, it is necessary to highlight the particular importance of human formation, as the necessary foundation of all formation.”

“Bearing in mind the opinion of those to whom he has entrusted the responsibility of formation, the bishop or major superior, before admitting the candidate to ordination, must arrive at a morally certain judgement on his qualities. In the case of a serious doubt in this regard, he must not admit him to ordination.

“The discernment of a vocation and the maturity of the candidate is also a serious duty of the rector and of the other persons entrusted with the work of formation in the seminary. Before every ordination, the rector must express his own judgment on whether the qualities required by the Church are present in the candidate.”

The spiritual director, though bound to secrecy, “represents the Church in the internal forum. In his discussions with the candidate, the spiritual director must especially point out the demands of the Church concerning priestly chastity and the affective maturity that is characteristic of the priest, as well as help him to discern whether he has the necessary qualities. The spiritual director has the obligation to evaluate all the qualities of the candidate’s personality and to make sure that he does not present disturbances of a sexual nature, which are incompatible with the priesthood. If a candidate practices homosexuality or presents deep-seated homosexual tendencies, his spiritual director, as well as his confessor, have the duty to dissuade him in conscience from proceeding towards ordination.

“It goes without saying that the candidate himself has the primary responsibility for his own formation. … It would be gravely dishonest for a candidate to hide his own homosexuality in order to proceed, despite everything, towards ordination. Such a deceitful attitude does not correspond to the spirit of truth, loyalty and openness that must characterize the personality of him who believes he is called to serve Christ and His Church in the ministerial priesthood.”

CONCLUSION

“This Congregation reaffirms the need for bishops, major superiors, and all relevant authorities to carry out an attentive discernment concerning the suitability of candidates for holy orders, from the time of admission to the seminary until ordination. This discernment must be done in light of a conception of the ministerial priesthood that is in accordance with the teaching of the Church.

“Let bishops, episcopal conferences and major superiors look to see that the constant norms of this Instruction be faithfully observed for the good of the candidates themselves, and to guarantee that the Church always has suitable priests who are true shepherds according to the heart of Christ."

Feel free to discuss in the comment box.

posted by drchrist, 17:13 | link | comments (17)

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Happy Advent!

posted by drchrist, 11:05 | link | comments

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

The First Thanksgiving

Via the Curt Jester:

By Michael Gannon Ph.D.

When on September 8, 1565 Pedro Menéndez de Avilés and his 800 Spanish settlers founded the settlement of St. Augustine in La Florida, the landing party celebrated a Mass of Thanksgiving, and, afterward, Menéndez laid out a meal to which he invited as guests the native Seloy tribe who occupied the site.

The celebrant of the Mass was St. Augustine’s first pastor, Father Francisco Lopez de Mendoza Grajales, and the feast day in the church calendar was that of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. What exactly the Seloy natives thought of those strange liturgical proceedings we do not know, except that, in his personal chronicle, Father Lopez wrote that “the Indians imitated all they saw done.”

What was the meal that followed? Again we do not know. But, from our knowledge of what the Spaniards had on board their five ships, we can surmise that it was cocido, a stew made from salted pork and garbanzo beans, laced with garlic seasoning, and accompanied by hard sea biscuits and red wine. If it happened that the Seloy contributed to the meal from their own food stores, fresh or smoked, then the menu could have included as well: turkey,venison, and gopher tortoise; seafood such as mullet, drum, and sea catfish; maize (corn),beans and squash.

What is important historically about that liturgy and meal was stated by me in a 1965 book entitled The Cross in the Sand: “It was the first community act of religion and thanksgiving in the first permanent [European] settlement in the land.” The keyword in that sentence was “permanent.” Numerous thanksgivings for a safe voyage and landing had been made before in Florida, by such explorers as Juan Ponce de León, in 1513 and 1521, Pánfilo de Narváez in 1528, Hernando de Soto in 1529, Father Luis Cáncer de Barbastro in 1549, and Tristán de Luna in 1559. Indeed French Calvinists (Huguenots) who came to the St. Johns River with Jean Ribault in 1562 and René de Laudonnière in 1564 similarly offered prayers of thanksgiving for their safe arrivals. But all of those ventures, Catholic and Calvinist, failed to put down permanent roots.

St. Augustine’s ceremonies were important historically in that they took place in what would develop into a permanently occupied European city, North America’s first. They were important culturally as well in that the religious observance was accompanied by a communal meal, to which Spaniards and natives alike were invited. The thanksgiving at St. Augustine, celebrated 56 years before the Puritan-Pilgrim thanksgiving at Plymouth Plantation (Massachusetts), did not, however, become the origin of a national annual tradition, as Plymouth would. The reason is that, as the maxim holds, it is the victors who write the histories.

During the 18th and 19th centuries British forces won out over those of Spain and France for mastery over the continent. Thus, British observances, such as the annual reenactment of the Pilgrims’ harvest festival in 1621, became a national practice and holiday in the new United States, and over time obliterated knowledge of the prior Spanish experiences in Florida, particularly at St. Augustine. Indeed, as the Pilgrims’ legend grew, people of Anglo-American descent in New England came to believe that Plymouth was the first European settlement in the country and that no other Europeans were here before the arrival of the Mayflower– beliefs that are still widespread in that region.

In recent years, Jamestown, Virginia has enjoyed some success in persuading its Anglo-American cousins in Plymouth that it was founded in 1607, thirteen years before the Pilgrims’ arrival, and that there were regular ship schedules from England to Jamestown before the Mayflower’s voyage of 1620. Furthermore, Berkeley Plantation near Charles City, Virginia, has convincingly demonstrated that it conducted a thanksgiving ceremony on December 4, 1619, nearly two years before the festival at Plymouth. Thought to have been on Berkeley’s menu were oysters, shad, rockfish, and perch. Along the old Spanish borderlands provinces from Florida to California an occasional voice is heard asserting that this site or that was the first permanent Spanish settlement in the United States – a claim often made in Santa Fe, New Mexico which was founded in 1610 – or that it was the place where the first thanksgiving took place. An example of the latter claim appeared last year in the New York Times, which, while recounting the colonizing expedition of Juan de Oñate from Mexico City into what became New Mexico, stated that celebrations of Oñate’s party in 1598 “are considered [the Times did not say by whom] the United States’ first Thanksgiving.”

The historical fact remains that St. Augustine’s thanksgiving not only came earlier; it was the first to take place in a permanent settlement. The Ancient City deserves national notice for that distinction.

Perhaps most of New England is now willing to concede as much, though that was not the case in November 1985, when an Associated Press reporter built a short Thanksgiving Day story around my aforesaid sentence of 20 years before in The Cross in the Sand. When his story appeared in Boston and other papers, New England went into shock. WBZ-TV in Boston interviewed me live by satellite for its 6:00 p.m. regional news
program.

The newsman told me that all of Massachusetts was “freaked out,” and that, as he spoke, “the Selectmen of Plymouth are holding an emergency meeting to contend with this new information that there were Spaniards in Florida before there were Englishmen in Massachusetts.”

I replied, “Fine. And you can tell them for me that, by the time the Pilgrims came to Plymouth, St. Augustine was up for urban renewal.”

The somewhat rattled chairman of the Selectmen was quoted as saying: “I hate to take the wind out of the professor’s sails, but there were no turkeys running around in Florida in the 1500s. But there may be a few loose ones down there now at the University of Florida.” So there! Within a few days of the tempest a reporter from the Boston Globe called to tell me that throughout Massachusetts I had become known as “The Grinch Who Stole Thanksgiving.” Well, let’s hope that everyone up north has settled down now. And let’s enjoy all our Thanksgivings whenever and wherever they first began.

Dr. Michael V. Gannon is a Distinguished Service Professor of History at the University of Florida. He has had a long interest in the early Spanish missions of Florida about which he has written extensively. Two of his books, Rebel Bishop (1964) and The Cross in the Sand (1965) treat of the early history of this state.

posted by drchrist, 11:20 | link | comments (1)

What Do You Think ?

Here are some excerpts from an article from the New York Daily News that you can find here.  Take a look and then let me know what your opinion is.  Is a Catholic School justified in having a policy in by which teachers agree to live lives according to Catholic Morality, and are they justified in enforcing it?

An unmarried rookie teacher at a Queens parochial school confessed to her principal she was pregnant - and was promptly fired for violating "Catholic morality."

"I don't understand how a religion that prides itself on forgiving and on valuing life could terminate me because I'm pregnant and choosing to have this baby," said McCusker in between sobs with her parents by her side.

The New York Civil Liberties Union filed a federal discrimination complaint on the mother-to-be's behalf against the Rockaway Beach school and Diocese of Brooklyn yesterday, charging McCusker was wrongly removed and that the church's policy unfairly targets women.

"The school fired Ms. McCusker ostensibly for engaging in nonmarital sex but neither the school nor the diocese that runs the school enforces this policy against men," said NYCLU's head of Reproductive Rights Anna Schissel.

Church leaders said McCusker agreed to rules in their teacher personnel handbook, which states "a teacher is required to convey the teachings of the Catholic faith by his or her words and actions, demonstrating an acceptance of Gospel values and the Christian tradition."

"This is a difficult situation for every person involved, but the school had no choice but to follow the principles contained in the teachers' personnel handbook," said diocese spokesman Frank DeRosa.

"If I decided to abort the baby, the decision to fire me would not have been made because they would not have known," said McCuster.

Let us all know what you think...

posted by drchrist, 08:13 | link | comments (15)

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Welcome Argus Leader Readers

The local Sioux Fall newspaper published a story today about Churches using technology to reach out which features yours truly.  Here is an excerpt:

With his blog, Christensen said, he is reaching people of all ages around the world. His site, www.priesthood.motime.com, receives 250 to 300 hits a day. On a recent weekday, people living in Portugal, India, the Philippines, the United Kingdom, Canada, the Solomon Islands, Israel and the United States had checked in.

Theresa Wallace attends Christensen's parish but keeps in touch with him through his blog, titled "White Around the Collar."

"He doesn't shy away from things that are hard to talk about, like sex education in Sioux Falls here or homosexuality or whatever," Wallace said. "I think what he's doing is a great service to people."

Through Christensen's blog, Wallace said, she has continued to learn more about her faith.

"It's a tool of evangelization in many ways," Christensen said.

That's one reason why, as a busy priest, he continues to make time to blog, Christensen said.

"The good thing about a blog is, I can start the conversation and it sort of takes on a life of its own, and I can step back," he said.

Not everyone has responded positively to Christensen's blog. Some of the ruder comments he deletes, others he leaves in, shrugging, "By their fruits, you will know them."

"It engages people on a whole new level," Christensen said of blogging. "It's a real, personal, human way of evangelization, not as human as going door to door but more personal than reading a book or reading a Web site. A blog has the aspect of conversation."

You can read the whole article here.

posted by drchrist, 08:27 | link | comments (3)

Some Perspective

Via Fr. Todd:

If you consider that there have been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq Theater of operations during the last 22 months and a total of 2112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000.

The rate in Washington D.C.(among others) is 80.6 per 100,000. That means that you are about 25% more likely to be shot and killed in our Nation's Capitol, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation, than you are in Iraq.

Conclusion: We should immediately pull out of Washington D.C

posted by drchrist, 08:21 | link | comments (5)

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Christ The King

"His empire includes not only Catholic nations, not only baptized persons who, though of right belonging to the Church, have been led astray by error, or have been cut off from her by schism, but also all those who are outside the Christian faith; so that truly the whole of mankind is subject to the power of Jesus Christ." - Pope Leo XIII

"When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony."  Pope Pius XI

Long Live Christ The King!

posted by drchrist, 11:25 | link | comments (1)

Friday, November 18, 2005

The Courage of Modern Martyrs

Be forewarned, the following is graphic:

Based on eyewitness accounts of those who have fled the North Korean dictatorship, the stories curdle the blood. For instance, in the building of a highway near Pyongyang, a house was demolished and a Bible was discovered hidden between bricks. Along with it was a list identifying a Christian pastor, two assistant pastors, two elders, and 20 members of the congregation.

All were rounded up and the five Christian leaders were told they could avoid death if they denied their faith and swore to serve only Kim Jong Il and his father, Kim Il Sung, the founder of the communist dictatorship. Refusing to do so, they were forced to lie down and a steamroller used in the highway construction was driven over them. The report continues, “Fellow parishioners who had been assembled to watch the execution cried, screamed out, or fainted when the skulls made a popping sound as they were crushed beneath the steamroller.”

How very sad that in today's world something like this would happen, yet I am sure their courage has inspired many to join the ranks of the sons and daughters of God.

posted by drchrist, 14:02 | link | comments (4)

This Doesn't Sound Good

Public comments are now being accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its newly proposed federal regulation regarding the testing of chemicals and pesticides on human subjects. On August 2, 2005, Congress had mandated the EPA create a rule that permanently bans chemical testing on pregnant women and children. But the EPA's newly proposed rule, misleadingly titled "Protections for Subjects in Human Research," puts industry profits ahead of children's welfare. The rule allows for government and industry scientists to treat children as human guinea pigs in chemical experiments in the following situations:

  1. Children who "cannot be reasonably consulted," such as those that are mentally handicapped or orphaned newborns may be tested on. With permission from the institution or guardian in charge of the individual, the child may be exposed to chemicals for the sake of research.
  2. Parental consent forms are not necessary for testing on children who have been neglected or abused.
  3. Chemical studies on any children outside of the U.S. are acceptable.

It doesn't sound like this is exactly in keeping with the dignity of the human person which we as Christians must uphold at all costs.  The road paved by the culture of death just gets more slippery every day.

posted by drchrist, 10:07 | link | comments (7)

Thursday, November 17, 2005

And Now A Word From Francis Cardinal Arinze

Regarding "music in the liturgy, we should start by saying that Gregorian music is the Church's precious heritage," he said. "It should stay. It should not be banished. If therefore in a particular diocese or country, no one hears Gregorian music anymore, then somebody has made a mistake somewhere."

What should not be the case, insists the Nigerian cardinal, is "individuals just composing anything and singing it in church. This is not right at all -- no matter how talented the individual is. That brings us to the question of the instruments to be used.

"The local church should be conscious that church worship is not really the same as what we sing in a bar, or what we sing in a convention for youth. Therefore it should influence the type of instrument used, the type of music used."

"I will not now pronounce and say never guitar; that would be rather severe," Cardinal Arinze added. "But much of guitar music may not be suitable at all for the Mass.

"People don't come to Mass in order to be entertained. They come to Mass to adore God, to thank him, to ask pardon for sins, and to ask for other things that they need."

"When they want entertainment, they know where to go -- parish hall, theater, presuming that their entertainment is acceptable from a moral theological point of view," added the cardinal, 73, who this year celebrated the 40th anniversary of his episcopal ordination.

Amen!  I think these comments from the chief liturgist for the Universal Church should be distributed to every liturgist in the United States.

You can read the whole article here.

posted by drchrist, 09:43 | link | comments (19)

Good Question

Click here to read a lovely little question posed by a fellow blogger.  It's really quite amusing, especially if you are into liturgy.

posted by drchrist, 09:36 | link | comments

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Absolutely and Completely Disgusting

The Los Angeles Times has added a regular pornography feature to its Entertainment section, prompting a family advocacy group to charge that the paper is adding to the growing problem of the normalization of pornography in society.

The American Family Association warned that the LA Times has since the spring had reporter Ralph Frammolino write a regular column covering the pornography industry. The AFA’s Ed Vitagliano commented: “The obvious next step,” in a society already over-sexualized would be “. . . for pornography just to be considered another part of the entertainment menu.”

The normalization of pornography by the media combined with an increasing trend to allow sexually explicit content in movies and other entertainment has led one author to credit the American Civil Liberties Union for keeping porn legitimate and allowing continued access to all. “Embracing pornography has become almost a new form of political correctness,” said Pamela Paul, the American author of Pornified: How Pornography is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships and Our Families.

A study released in 2002 found that viewing pornography leads to several behavioral, psychological and social problems. The authors concluded that exposure to pornography puts viewers at increased risk for developing sexually deviant tendencies, committing sexual offences, experiencing difficulties in intimate relationships, and accepting of the rape myth. Evidence of a causal connection between pornography and violent sex crimes has also been established.

I can't believe this is true.  How could people allow this to happen.  I know that if I lived in LA (thank God I don't) I would be preaching about this with the fire of the Holy Ghost, and not only that, but I would be praying outside the LA Times offices.  I hope and pray that people who live there will do just that.

posted by drchrist, 16:01 | link | comments (4)

Archbishop Raymond Burke Writes About My Alma Mater

Archbishop Burke recently wrote an article in the St. Louis Review about Kenrick-Glennon Seminary and the upcoming Apostolic Visitation.  In the article he addresses a number of issues, one of which is the "homosexual" problem which is being addressed by a soon to be released Vatican document.

His Excellency stated "As you may have noted in the coverage in the local secular media some two weeks ago, the claim was made that the apostolic visitation is directed at a kind of purging of any person with same-sex attraction from the seminary. The objectives of the apostolic visitation, rather, aim to assist seminaries and seminarians in dealing with erroneous thinking and practice in the area of sexual morality. The key is the right moral thinking and action of seminarians who are helped to grow strong in the virtues of purity and chastity, knowing that homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered and never justified. Put in another way, the formation in the seminary is to help the seminarians grow strong in respect for the conjugal meaning of the human body, both in their thinking and acting. In other words, one’s sexuality is seen as ordered to the exclusive and perpetual union of man and woman in marriage, which has its highest fruit in the procreation of offspring. For the seminarian and priest, respect for the conjugal meaning of the body means giving up the good of the marital union and, therefore, any sexual activity, in order to direct one’s affections totally to Christ and His Mystical Body in the priestly ministry.

The apostolic visitation rightly aims at assuring that the seminarians are correct in their moral judgments regarding sexual matters and, specifically, homosexual acts, and that the seminarians are, in fact, leading a pure and chaste life. For the rest, if a seminarian suffers from same-sex attraction, the matter must be addressed respectfully and thoroughly on an individual basis, so that no seminarian is advanced to holy orders who does not acknowledge, also in practice, the always disordered nature of homosexual acts, and so that no seminarian who cultivates same-sex attraction or engages in homosexual acts is permitted to remain in the seminary. The concern regarding the homosexual condition, which is required by the results of the study of the sexual abuse of minors by the clergy, is, therefore, placed within the context of the totality of concerns which the apostolic visitation must address. "

He also spoke of the background of the Apostolic Visitation by pointing out that "to understand the specific objectives, it is necessary to review the background of the apostolic visitation.The cardinals of the United States and the leadership of our conference of bishops requested the apostolic visitation during their meeting with our late and most beloved Pope John Paul II in April 2002, regarding the most grave evil of the sexual abuse of minors by the clergy. Given the gravity of the evil involved, it was rightly observed that seminaries should be visited to make certain that every possible care be taken to avoid the ordination of a seminarian who would eventually sexually abuse children and young people.

The majority of the cases of sexual abuse of minors by the clergy do not involve true pedophilia, that is, the sexual abuse of pre-adolescent children, but homosexual acts perpetrated upon adolescents. The highest incidence of the acts occurred during the 1970s and 1980s, a period marked by a general decline in seminary discipline and the strong emergence of an erroneous moral theology. Over the past years, the Church has been giving constant attention to the restoration of the necessary discipline in seminaries, especially the asceticism required to lead a chaste life, in accord with the promise of celibacy or perpetual continence. With regard to seminary discipline, I can tell you that I am edified at the discipline followed at Kenrick-Glennon Seminary. "

posted by drchrist, 14:58 | link | comments (11)

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Few Ministers Respond to Planned Parenthood Invitation

Hmm...I wonder why?

Could it be because they kill millions of innocent babies?  They don't think so. They think it's because they are getting closer to Jesus:

Hoping to show that it is not anti-Christian, Planned Parenthood's Lexington affiliate is bringing the organization's national chaplain to speak with area clergy this week. But so far, only a handful of religious leaders have agreed to meet with him.

David Bowman, board chairman of Planned Parenthood of the Bluegrass, said it hasn't been easy to spread the word about chaplain Ignacio Castuera's visit.

"Most church organizations would not give me names and e-mail addresses for their clergy," he said. "There were many organizations, both denominational and ecumenical, that didn't want to get involved."

Castuera, a United Methodist minister from the Watts section of Los Angeles and the first Planned Parenthood national chaplain, wasn't surprised.

"The closer Jesus got to the cross, the smaller the crowds got," the chaplain said. "This is pretty close to the cross because people have to take derision, ostracism, all that."

Castuera's position on abortion: "It's always a tragedy," he said. "I don't think it's a sin."

Bring him to my parish and I'll talk to him.  He won't like what I have to say...but I'll talk to him.

posted by drchrist, 08:44 | link | comments (2)

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Either He's Really, Really Funny Or This Is A Mistranslation

The legacy of Pope John Pail II "includes, among various examples, a shining attitude towards prayer. We now pick up his spiritual heritage under the guidance of his heavenly intercession," said today Pope Benedict XVI during a sermon to celebrate late cardinals and bishops. "Over the last 12 months," said the current Pope, "we have had five revered cardinals who kicked the bucket: Juan Carlos Aramburu, Jan Pieter Schotte, Corrado Bafile, Jaime Sin and, less than a month ago, Giuseppe Caprio.

posted by drchrist, 17:13 | link | comments (4)

Friday, November 11, 2005

Resquiescat in Pace

Please pray for the repose of the soul of Fr. Wilfred Lambertz OSB who died suddenly yesterday.  Fr. Wilfred was pastor of my home parish twice and was a mentor, role model, and spiritual father to me.  If there is any priest who I can say encouraged me the most in my journey to the priesthood - especially early on in my life - it is Fr. Wilfred.  He was known for his amazing sense of humor, his love for the youth (he was frequently seen at the local High School and attended every local sporting event he could), and his unconditional love for everyone  - no matter who you were.  He will be missed my many, many people.

posted by drchrist, 07:40 | link | comments (3)

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Sioux City Gets a Bishop

Msgr. Ralph Walker Nickless, vicar general and pastor of the parish of Our Lady of Fatima in the archdiocese of Denver, U.S.A., as bishop of Sioux City (area 37,587, population 468,549, Catholics 94,186, priests 150, permanent deacons 36, religious 86), U.S.A. The bishop-elect was born in Denver in 1947 and ordained a priest in 1973.

Read more about it here and here.

posted by drchrist, 11:28 | link | comments (2)

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Seminarian Dictionary

Some of you will find this amusing...others will just scratch your head and wonder what it all means...so enjoy:

A MODERN SEMINARIANS’ DICTIONARY
Published in “Fidelity”, September 1987, pp. 23-25.

Brother seminarians! Are you troubled by the non‑judgmental expectations of the seminary? Are you confused by their concerns? Fear not. Before your eyes you have the key to ordination in this person’s seminary. Add these terms to your theological lexicon and believe me, you could well be ordained one or two years early!

PASTORAL: Effeminate; an attribute lacking in a man who demonstrates overt masculine attributes of clarity, decisiveness, and orthodoxy: G.K. Chesterton was not pastoral.
RIGID: Your view is not my view; normally, the rigid person has a simplistic view of Catholic doctrine (see SIMPLISTIC); for example, a rigid person holds that the ordination of women is not possible; a flexible person holds that to fail to ordain women is an example of sexism. Evelyn Waugh was rigid: “It is better to be narrow‑minded than to have no mind, to hold limited and rigid principles than to have none at all. That is the danger which faces so many people today ‚ to have no considered opinions on any subject, to put up with what is wasteful and harmful with the excuse that there ‘is good in everything’ ‚ which in most cases means an inability to distinguish between good and bad.”
VISION: The quality of agreeing with me.
JUDGMENTAL: A person who judges the sin but not the sinner. A non‑judgmental person utters not a word on the morality of the usual sexual sins, but tries to determine “where a person’s at” so that the person’s motives can be judged accordingly; a non‑judgmental person judges the sinner but not the sin.
SIMPLISTIC: Having to do with common sense.
CATHOLIC FUNDAMENTALIST: A simplistic person who tries to live the Faith in a docile and pious way; also a Catholic who frequently prays the Rosary.
FLEXIBLE: You agree with me; a flexible person is open and dialogues on any issue, smiles knowingly and does precisely what he started out to do.
CHALLENGE: To recognize that my views are better than your views.
GROWTH: For you to assimilate my way of thinking into your life.
ENABLE: An essential attribute of a priest whereby he is able to convince others to do things his way without parishioners catching on to the deception.
NETWORKING: Allowing nuns to run parishes.
I HEAR YOU: A clever way of telling you that I don†t agree with you but I don†t want to sound dogmatic, rigid or inflexible.
WE HAVE NO RIGHT ANSWERS/WE DON'T HAVE MANY ANSWERS: Except this one (cf. Archbishop Rembert Weakland on homosexuality: “...I would like to state that I do not have all the answers on this highly complex issue...” (The Catholic Herald, July19, 1980.)
YOU’RE NOT LISTENING: The way a flexible, non‑judgmental person expresses disappointment that a rigid, dogmatic person doesn’t agree with him; example: the Pope is “not listening” to the American Church.
OPEN AND HONEST: Telling religious superiors what they want to hear.
WOUNDED HEALER: The term used to convince a person who doesn’t “feel good about himself” to feel good about himself without Confession.
WHERE YOU’RE AT: Your psychological condition when you’re in the state of mortal sin calling for acceptance and a non‑judgmental attitude.
WHERE ARE THOSE TEARS COMING FROM?: The standard question to ask troubled or sick persons when you have nothing else to fill up the unnerving silence.
COMPLEX TECHNOLOGICAL WORLD: The reason for resisting one’s conscience when opposing the teaching of the Catholic Church; also, the standard response a flexible person uses when a rigid person seems to be winning an argument.
VALUING YOUR SEXUALITY: Obsession with the usual adolescent preoccupations.
WE ARE ALL SEXUAL BEINGS: The reason to overlook sexual misbehavior in seminaries. CELIBACY: Refraining from heterosexual genital activity.
PROCESS: The spontaneous movement in the dialogue of group therapy sessions never to be disrupted by thinking.
FEELING: The highest faculty of the human person left fully untouched by original sin. ORIGINAL SIN: See SEXISM.
LOVE: A nice feeling.
THINKING: The most dangerous activity in a seminary; cause for psychological counseling; those who think “disrupt the process”; see PROCESS.
TOUCH, MINISTRY OF: Physical contact to demonstrate that one has the capacity of intimacy; does not necessarily involve an exchange of bodily fluids.
IN TOUCH WITH FEELINGS: Using the intellect to explicitly identify what one is feeling so that speech patterns can be altered to communicate one’s sensitivity and compassion; not to be confused with “intellectualizing your feelings”.
INTELLECTUALIZING YOUR FEELINGS: Controlling one’s temper.
COMPASSION: The warm feeling one has for oneself at any given time; one who has compassion needs to tell others he/she has compassion, otherwise compassion isn’t present; see also IN TOUCH WITH FEELINGS.
COMPASSION BURNOUT: The loss of the warm feeling one has for oneself when charitable works become wearisome or otherwise costly.
SENSITIVITY: The ability to identify and agree with the conventional wisdom of left‑wing political issues such as feminism, gay rights, dissent,etc. Tim Unsworth of the National Catholic Reporter describes a sensitive priest: “But Vince Connery also cries a lot. He cries openly and unashamedly in private conversation and in public. He doesn’t cover his face or hide it in the crook of his elbow. He simply stands there and cries, letting the tears flow and the voice break; and if someone reaches out even slightly, Connery will share an embrace while he cries some more. It soon becomes clear that this is an emotionally healthy priest in an emotionally unhealthy church” (NCR April, 1987).
TOTAL COMMITMENT: The intensity of involvement in charitable works until one finds that one “doesn’t feel good” about oneself; total commitments usually last six months to a year.
LEGALISM: Accepting at face value and obediently implementing what a document, law, or guideline reads.
OBEDIENCE: A word which doesn’t exist.
RULES: A word that once was operative but was done away with by the Second Vatican Council.
EXPECTATIONS: Flexible guidelines which change as frequently as the feelings of the Rector; not to be confused with RULES or LEGALISM.
REPRESSED ANGER: If detected, a cause for dismissal from the seminary; probable cause of both world wars, the Holocaust, and the election of Ronald Reagan [and George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush]; a technique absolutely essential for an orthodox seminarian to get ordained.
FORMATION: Kindergarten.
AFFIRMATION: The flattery due to someone who is in a position of authority.
AUTHORITY: Cannot exist or be invoked unless vested in a sensitive, flexible, non‑judgmental and compassionate person (see SENSITIVE, FLEXIBLE, and JUDGMENTAL).
SEXISM: The sin associated with being male.
MALE DOMINATION: The irritating interest men have in sports, cigars, and male‑bondingƒespecially in the hierarchy of the Church; the only mortal personal sin.
FEMININITY: A word created by a sexist, male‑dominated society to subjugate women in the maternal role; the presence of femininity in women religious is a cause to recommend psychological counseling.
GETTING IN TOUCH WITH ONE’S FEMININE SIDE: An essential requirement for ordination to the priesthood.
NEGATIVE: The bad attitude having to do with the recognition of personal sin; also, any disposition which is not happy with the policies and views of sensitive, flexible and non-judgmental people.
CHANGE: Mandated by the Second Vatican Council; must be open to all change unless instituted recently; see WE HAVE NO RIGHT ANSWERS.
CONCERN: The response that a sensitive, flexible, non-judgmental and compassionate people in authority have when someone doesn't agree with them.
HUMANKIND: The human race free of sexism (see SEXISM).
PARENTING: The activity of humankind in begetting children (see HUMANKIND).
SPIRIT OF VATICAN II: Church activities and programs which have absolutely no relationship to the letter of the documents of Vatican II.
ONGOING: The period of time between the Second Vatican Council and the implementation of the Spirit of Vatican II (see SPIRIT OF VATICAN II).
RELEVANT: Anything to do with dissent from Church teaching.
PAIN: The focus of Church dissent; felt by the editors of the National Catholic Reporter and inflicted by the editors of The Wanderer.
REDEFINING THE CHURCH: Defining the Church according to the Spirit of Vatican II (see SPIRIT OF VATICAN II).
LIBERATION: The replacement of existing structures of constraint with new and improved structures of constraint.
CONSCIENCE: The final arbiter of the correctness of one†s action always to be guided by the latest in Church dissent.
PRE‑VATICAN II: A person who accepts at face value the teaching of the Church and who reads the documents of the Second Vatican Council without reference to a commentary.
CHURCH: Me.
MACROCHURCH: The male-dominated, sexist, oppressive, authoritarian hierarchical Church.
MICROCHURCH: The pastoral, flexible, open and honest, compassionate, open-to-change, local Christian community.
COLLEGIALITY: The doctrine defined by the Spirit of Vatican II stating that bishops have exactly the same authority as the Bishop of Rome.
BISHOP OF ROME: The local ordinary of an obscure diocese in Italy.
RADICALLY CONSERVATIVE: Reason to ignore the current discipline of the Church.
THE FUTURE: The last and enduring hope of Church dissenters.
WE CAN’T GO BACK: An absolutely efficacious and disarming argument.
HUMANAE VITAE: The biggest mistake the Church has made since the Council of Trent.
COUNCIL OF TRENT: A convenient summary of medieval myths and superstitions. ECUMENISM: The process of transforming the liturgical rites of the mainline Christian denominations into a single rite of coffee, donuts and dialogue.
TRADITION: A practice established before the Middle Ages or after the Second Vatican Council.
THE LAITY: The future of the Church; cannot be ignored unless associated with ultra-conservative groups.
ULTRA‑CONSERVATIVE: Anyone who disagrees with the National Catholic Reporter.
TRADITIONAL NUN: Irrelevant; an embarrassment to women religious.
WOMEN RELIGIOUS: Feminist nun; an oxymoron.
SOCIAL JUSTICE: The realignment of social structures according to the platform of the Democratic Party.
PROGRESSIVE: Pouring the wine of old heresies into new wineskins.
CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING: The method of argumentation used by radical feminists moving adult males to action: “Better to live in a corner of the house‑top than have a nagging wife and a brawling household” (Prov.21:9).
EXPERIENCE: The only valid way to substantiate one’s opinions and beliefs; there’s no such thing as a"bad experience”.
SPEAK OUT: The activity springing from the virtue of Social Justice whereby sensitive and compassionate persons, with great emotion, promote the platform of the Democratic Party.
SHRILL: The nasty habit rigid and judgmental people have when they dare to disagree with the demands of Social Justice (see SOCIAL JUSTICE).
PREFERENTIAL OPTION FOR THE POOR: Socialism.
MINISTRY: All human activity.
COMFORT, COMFORTABLE: The final cause and proper object of ministry.
PLURALISM: The acceptance of all points of view except those with a point of view which doesn't accept all points of view.
CLERICALISM: The attitude of priests who knowingly and willingly practice the sacramental aspects of the priesthood with diligence, reverence and joy.
HOMOPHOBIC: The psychological condition of those who witness and report acts of homosexuality to seminary authorities.
GAY: Deeply sensitive person who naturally possesses the skills for effective pastoral ministry; oppressed minority; in no way connected with pederasty: cf. Fr. James L. Arimond: “Don’t confuse homosexual orientation with other sexual minorities: transexual; pederasty; bafoonery; etc.” from an Archdiocese of Milwaukee workshop in Gay Ministry.
SEXUAL PREFERENCE: Feeling good about some or all objects of desire whether animal, vegetable or mineral.
MISSION STATEMENT: A written objective or goal of a pastoral program upon which the success of the Gospel of Jesus Christ depends.
INTERFACE: A term, borrowed from computer technology, where sensitive and compassionate people dialogue among themselves; similar to the dialogue that the farmers and pigs engaged in in George Orwell's Animal Farm.
ORDINATION: An archaic celebration in the Church still useful to mark the beginning of full-time ministry.
SEMINARY: School where men and women are prepared for full-time ministry.
OUTREACH: Any program for whatever reasons; also known as reach out; usually involves fundraising.
VOCATIONS CRISIS: Refers to the Church†s failure to relax the rules on celibacy and failure to ordain women.
SHARE: The practice of discussing the deepest intimacies of one†s life in front of complete strangers.
WORKSHOP: A church-sponsored meeting to ensure that the issues of optional celibacy, women's ordination, the Sandinistas and leisure suits are still being addressed. SELF‑ACTUALIZATION: Salvation; no longer a mortal sin.
DIALOGUE: The deft use of banal clichés in conversation.
PROPHETIC/PROPHET: One who has the courage to speak out on one's behalf; e.g., Charlie Curran.
CURRAN, CHARLIE: Twentieth century saint; went into debt defending his faith. EMPOWER: To encourage others to think for themselves; cf., Evelyn Waugh: “Every effort was made to encourage the children at the public schools to think for themselves. When they should have been whipped and taught Greek paradigms, they were set arguing about birth control and nationalization. Their crude little opinions were treated with respect. Preachers in the school chapel week after week entrusted the future to their hands. It is hardly surprising that they were Bolshevik at 18 and bored at 20.”
POWERFUL: A spontaneous exclamation from hearing one's own views restated in a more banal fashion.
LITURGISTS: “A society of men among us, bred from their youth in the art of proving by words multiplied for the purpose, that white is black, and black is white, according as they are paid” (Swift, Gulliver's Travels).
EASTER DUTY: Annual sacrilege.
PSYCHOLOGIST: Infallible teaching authority in the Church.
OFFICIAL CHURCH TEACHING: “I don't expect it to change anybody's mind one way or another. Catholics today have learned what it means to be selectively obedient to the Church†s teaching” (Father Richard McBrien, Washington Post, December16,1981).
CHASTITY: Safe sex.
SAFE SEX: Taking appropriate precautions during high risk sexual activity; not to be confused with responsible love.
RESPONSIBLE LOVE: Sexual relations only within marriage with a spouse; an ideal impossible to sustain in a complex technological world.
HIGH RISK SEXUAL ACTIVITY: Sodomy; the term neo‑Victorian Catholics use when referring to the kinds of sexual activity St. Paul warned against.
CLOWN MASS: Liturgical innovation comparable to the innovation of Gregorian chant; relevant: “A clown liturgy may sound sacrilegious but those who attended a special Mass at St. Agnes Church described it as moving, uplifting, spirited and colorful” (Catholic Herald, Milwaukee, February 16, 1984).
LITURGICAL DANCE: Liturgical innovation comparable to the innovation of Gregorian chant: “Today's procession into the altar by the priest and some members of the laity was a dance in the early church” (Sister Barbara Link); relevant: “To me, my body is my instrument; it's my way of expressing myself, she said, gesturing frequently with hand to convey her thoughts. "I feel free when I dance; it's a natural expression.” (Sister Barbara Link, quoted in the Milwaukee Sentinel, August 3, 1985).

posted by drchrist, 11:44 | link | comments (13)

Friday, November 04, 2005

A Very Letterman - Like Top Ten List

If Judge Alito is confirmed as a Supreme Court Justice Catholics would be the majority religion.  Some have speculated what changes that might mean.  Here is list of the top ten things that may change:

10) Meat-less Fridays all year round in the Supreme Court cafeteria;

9) Oral arguments in Latin;

8) The bones of Chief Justice Marshall will be disinterred and placed in a glass coffin in the center of the Supreme Court bench;

7) Collections between each session of oral argument;

6) Supreme Court windows replaced with stained glass;

5) On close votes, the Justices will consult a statue of St. Thomas More. If the statue weeps, they affirm; if no tears, then they reverse.

4) Incense at the start of each session;

3) Supreme Court opinions will be deemed infallible and unreviewable by any earthly authority [Ed. - Sorry -
that does not appear to be a change at all
]

2) Catechism of the Catholic Church will now be "persuasive authority";

And, the number one change which a Catholic majority would make to the Supreme Court . . .

1) Wednesday night bingo!

posted by drchrist, 10:29 | link | comments (3)

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Bill Clinton and Judge Alito

Kathryn Jean Lopez, at National Review Online, observed: "I just noted Clinton's hand. Couldn't keep his hand off Alito's daughter..."

Biretta tip to Fr. Martin Fox.

posted by drchrist, 11:42 | link | comments (7)

Sex Ed In Sioux Falls

As many of you may or may not be aware South Dakota has been chosen by death loving people like the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and NARAL to be the trial state for much of their propaganda.  The latest development in their campaign to educate our children straight into hell is the sex ed curriculum for middle school students.

The Sioux Falls Public School District is  trying to decide whether to allow the Health Smart middle school health and sex education curriculum to be reinstated and used. It was temporarily pulled out of the middle schools because parents filed complaints about the graphic nature of the material. Since then, parents, teachers, and medical professionals have reviewed the material and done their own research on it. Some of the findings included:

Some information is medically inaccurate or misleading.

  • The material makes the assumption that all of our 11, 12, 13, and 14 year old children are or are planning on becoming sexually active in the near future. This is just not true, especially in Sioux Falls, South Dakota .
  • The publisher, ETR Associates, has endorsed guidelines for sexuality education which are very graphic and anti-family.  This curriculum follows these guidelines.
  • This material minimizes the role of the parents in educating our children about sex, and undermines the parent-child relationship.
  • The material downplays the risks and consequences of having sex before marriage.
  • The message of abstinence before marriage is not made clear for children. In fact, the word “marriage” is hardly mentioned.

 Now is the time. You might be wondering what you can do:

1.                          Call the review committee members and the school board and voice your concerns.

2.                          Plan on coming to the next committee meeting on November 7 at the Instructional Planning Center .

3.                          Request to review the sex education curriculum at your middle school.

Don’t think this doesn’t affect you if you don’t have a middle-schooler. If you have a child as young as kindergarten, they will be taught this material. It will be in place for SEVEN years if used. Also, don’t think that this doesn’t affect you if your kids are in Christian schools. Your tax dollars are paying for this material. Also, it’s a possibility that your child will end up dating a person who has been fed this garbage for three years.

Below are the numbers for the committee members and school board members, and also phone tips and talking points to use when you call. I heard recently that, if we set the standard for our children low, you can guarantee they’ll hit the mark. So let’s set the standard high for our kids because we love them and we want the very best for them.

If you want to call committee members and/or school board members but don't know what to say, here are a few suggestions:

Hello, I am ___________________, a (student, parent, tax payer, concerned citizen, etc.)__.  I am calling you this evening to ask that you do not allow any curriculum published by ETR in our schools.  I have concerns that the ETR curriculum:

(choose one or two):

  • includes information that is medically inaccurate or misleading.

-         condom effectiveness statistics are false high

-         STD information claims “most are curable” and trivializes the contraction of an STD

-         Information on AIDS downplays the seriousness of the disease

-         Emotional and psychological consequences from sexual activity are never discussed

  • includes statements that make the assumption that all of our middle school children are or are planning on becoming sexually active in the near future.

-         abstinence until marriage is not discussed as a social or community norm

-         abstinence until marriage is not discussed as the expected standard

-         marriage is hardly even mentioned

  • follows SIECUS guidelines for sexuality education which are very graphic and anti-family, and anti- abstinence-until-marriage. 

-         Although the school personnel have been quoted as saying the graphic concepts were not supposed to be taught, nowhere in the Sioux Falls School District curriculum was this stated or explained.

-         Even if the explicit material is not to be taught, it should not even be in the classrooms or libraries of the schools.  

  • includes material which minimizes the role of the parents in educating our children about sex, and undermines the parent-child relationship.

-         Children are asked to form their own opinions about sexually activity, and instructed that certain religions or families may have different opinions. 

  • includes material which downplays the risks and consequences of having sex outside of marriage, and blatantly propagandizes our children into having sex.

-         Many student worksheets involve sexual scenarios

-         Statements to be read include thing like “future sexual partners” the plural use of partners assumes sex with more than one person who will not be a spouse

-         The Sioux Falls School District curriculum materials (and also the Health Smart books) contain an abundance of contraception information (which does not include abstinence-until- marriage as an option).  This is unacceptable for students who are too young to legally have sex.  Further, none of the contraception information mentions the established medical dangers of the contraception methods (blood clot, osteoporosis, breast cancer, death).

 

Thank you for listening to my concerns.  Please vote to remove all ETR texts from the Sioux Falls School district , not just the sex education portions.

 

Also, when calling committee members and school board members:

  1. Be specific in what you’re asking for.
  2. Give reasons for your position.
  3. Be short and to the point.
  4. Mention the official name (Health Smart health education curriculum)
  5. Be respectful. State your views in a firm but courteous tone.
  6. Be sure to thank them for their time.  

Contact Numbers

Review Committee Members:

Fred Aderhold:  332-3053

Heather Conrad: 361-4971

Rhonda Kemmis: 338-6199

Larry Hoover: 357-0910

Betty Gustafson: 336-1930

Steve Cain: 763-5822

School Board Members:

Pam Homan: 274-1058

Sheri Meister: 362-0233

Kevin Lampa: 333-0510

Sam Amato: 332-6403

Debbie Hoffman: 310-7707

Joy Smolnisky: 335-5981

posted by drchrist, 08:34 | link | comments (3)

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Bishop With A Backbone

Bishop Tobin of Providence once gave our annual retreat when I was studying at Kenrick.  He was solid then, and apparently he is solid now.  Check out what he has to say about abortion:

"...When an abortion takes place, a baby dies.  A Catholic doesn't have the option of being "pro-choice" if that choice leads to the death of a child...
Now, even as I write this I know some will object saying, "What about the other issues related to human life? What about war, capital punishment, violence, poverty and abuse?" Well it's certainly true that these issues are important and legitimate pro-life concerns...Abortion is different.  It is always intrinsically evil.  There are no circumstances that justify abortion.  Its victims are innocent and defenseless, and number in the millions. Without a doubt, abortion is the fallacious foundation upon which the culture of death builds its ugly edifice. Being passionately committed to other human life issues does not excuse an individual from personally and publicly opposing the grave sin of abortion."

Amen Bishop Tobin!  We need more Bishops like you...I have a few suggestions on who they might be...but the Pope doesn't ask me...and I am sure He has His reasons.

You can read the whole article here.

posted by drchrist, 13:41 | link | comments (4)

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

The Amazing Dancing Judge Alito

Yes, it's quite strange, but oh how funny.

posted by drchrist, 14:50 | link | comments (1)

This Torks Me Off

Read this, then do something about it:  The president of the school is Sr. Helen Timothy, htimothy@loretto.net, and the principal is Sr. Barbara Nelson, bnelson@loretto.net.

posted by drchrist, 14:47 | link | comments (3)